Eddy Current Testing (ECT): Complete Guide to Principles, Types, Standards & Applications

Eddy Current Testing (ECT) is an electromagnetic NDT method that detects surface and near-surface defects in electrically conductive materials. An alternating current through a probe coil induces circulating eddy currents in the part; cracks, corrosion, and material variations disrupt those currents and shift the coil's impedance, which the instrument displays on an impedance plane or C-scan. ECT is the preferred method for fatigue-crack detection in aerospace, heat-exchanger and steam-generator tube inspection, and — via Pulsed Eddy Current (PEC) — corrosion under insulation (CUI) screening in oil & gas.

Why Use Eddy Current Inspection? Key Advantages

  • Extreme sensitivity to surface and near-surface cracks (detects <0.5mm cracks)
  • Fast scanning speeds (500–1,000 mm/s) for rapid area coverage
  • No surface preparation — inspects through paint and oxidation
  • Works on all conductive materials: aluminum, titanium, stainless and carbon steel, copper
  • Quantitative impedance-plane data for defect characterization
  • No radiation, no couplant, fully portable

How Eddy Current Testing Works

  1. Induction: the AC-powered probe coil creates an alternating magnetic field in the test material
  2. Eddy current formation: the field induces circular currents in the conductive part
  3. Opposition: per Lenz's law, the eddy currents generate an opposing magnetic field
  4. Impedance change: a crack, corrosion, or material change disrupts current flow and alters coil impedance
  5. Signal display: the instrument plots magnitude and phase on the impedance plane, distinguishing defects from geometry and material effects — deeper defects produce characteristic phase shifts

7 Types of Eddy Current Testing

TypeFrequency RangePenetrationIdeal For
Conventional fixed probeHigh (50–500 kHz)1–2mmFatigue cracks, surface flaws
Differential probeHigh (50–500 kHz)1–3mmSmall cracks, fastener holes, noise rejection
Absolute (self-comparison) probeMid (10–100 kHz)2–5mmCorrosion, pitting, material sorting
Pancake coilMid (10–100 kHz)2–4mmBroad surface coverage: fuselage, plate
Bobbin coilMid-high (20–100 kHz)2–5mmTube and pipe inspection
Bridge impedance analysisVariable (1–500 kHz)1–5mmHigh-precision defect sizing
Pulsed eddy current (PEC)Low (0.1–10 kHz)10–25mmCUI through insulation and thick coatings

Bobbin coils dominate steam-generator and condenser tube inspection in power plants; PEC has become the go-to screening tool for corrosion under insulation on in-service piping without stripping insulation.

ECT Applications by Industry

  • Aerospace (safety-critical): engine blade and disc crack detection, landing gear, fuselage fatigue cracks, fastener-hole inspection
  • Oil & Gas: CUI screening with PEC, weld flaw detection, tubing inspection, subsea components
  • Power Generation (safety-critical): nuclear steam-generator tubes, boiler tubes, turbine blades, heat-exchanger corrosion
  • Automotive: crankshafts, suspension components, bearing races
  • Manufacturing: fastener QC, bearings, gears, casting screening
  • Rail (safety-critical): axle and wheel crack detection, rail flaw inspection

ECT Standards and Codes

  • ASTM E309 — eddy current examination of steel tubular products using magnetic saturation (not a general ET practice)
  • ASTM E426 — eddy-current testing of tubing: sensitivity levels and acceptance criteria
  • ISO 15549 — general principles of eddy current testing
  • ASME BPVC Section V, Article 8 — eddy current examination requirements invoked by ASME construction codes
  • Boeing BAC 5571 / Airbus specifications — aerospace structural ECT requirements beyond generic standards

ECT vs Other NDT Methods

MethodSpeedDepthBest At
Eddy Current (ECT)Fast (500–1,000 mm/s)Shallow (1–5mm; 10–25mm PEC)Surface cracks in conductive materials, tubing
Magnetic Particle (MT)ModerateVery shallow (<1mm)Surface cracks in ferromagnetic steel
Penetrant (PT)Slow (dwell/drying)Surface-breaking onlyOpen-to-surface defects, any metal
Ultrasonic (UT)Point/encoded scansVery deep (100mm+)Internal defects, wall thickness
Radiography (RT)Very slowFull volumePorosity, permanent records

Choose ECT over MT for non-ferrous alloys and sub-0.5mm crack sensitivity; over PT for speed and no liquid contamination; over UT when surface-crack sensitivity beats depth (UT still owns thickness measurement); and over RT when speed and safety matter more than a volumetric image — the same trade-off logic covered in our RT vs UT comparison. Full method details live on our eddy current testing service page.

ECT Equipment

Equipment tiers (third-party OEMs): portable single-channel instruments (Olympus NORTEC, Eddyfi) form the entry tier; multi-channel laboratory/production systems and pulsed eddy current units occupy the mid tier; automated tube-inspection scanners represent the largest investment, processing 100+ tubes per day versus 10–20 with portable kit. Budgets vary by probe set, frequency range, and channel count — request a scoped recommendation. Calibration reference standards and annual probe maintenance add modest recurring costs.

ECT Certification: ASNT ET Level II and Level III

ECT personnel certify to ASNT SNT-TC-1A or ISO 9712. ET Level II requires roughly 80–160 hours of formal training plus 800–1,200 hours of field experience, with written, practical, and specific examinations. ET Level III adds 3+ years of experience and advanced examination, qualifying holders to write procedures, set acceptance criteria, and train Level I/II staff — and typically raising salary 30–60% over Level II. Aerospace inspectors add OEM type qualifications (Boeing/Airbus) with periodic recertification. Exam fees are set by the certifying body — see ASNT for current fees. Atlantis NDT's ASNT ET Level II prep is ASNT Level III-led, and our ASNT Level III consulting team develops and approves ET procedures for inspection companies.

Limitations of Eddy Current Testing

  • Conductive materials only — no composites, plastics, or ceramics
  • Shallow penetration (1–5mm standard; 10–25mm with PEC) — internal defects need UT
  • Sensitive to material property variations (heat treatment, permeability)
  • Complex geometry can produce confusing signals; skilled interpretation required
  • Cannot measure remaining wall thickness (UT preferred)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is eddy current testing in NDT?

Eddy current testing (ECT, or ET) is an electromagnetic NDT method: a coil carrying alternating current induces eddy currents in a conductive part, and defects that disrupt those currents change the coil impedance. It excels at detecting surface and near-surface cracks in aircraft structures, tubing, and welds.

What is eddy current inspection used for?

Primary uses: fatigue-crack detection in aerospace components, heat-exchanger and steam-generator tube inspection (bobbin coils), corrosion-under-insulation screening with pulsed eddy current, conductivity and coating-thickness measurement, and fastener-hole inspection with rotating probes.

How deep can eddy current testing detect defects?

Penetration depends on frequency and conductivity: high-frequency probes (>100 kHz) reach 1–2mm, mid-frequency 3–5mm, low-frequency 5–10mm. Pulsed eddy current extends effective screening to 10–25mm through insulation and coatings. For deeper volumetric inspection, ultrasonic testing is the right tool.

What materials can be tested with ECT?

Any electrically conductive material: aluminum, titanium, copper, austenitic stainless steel, and — with permeability-compensating techniques — ferromagnetic carbon steels. Non-conductive materials (composites, plastics, ceramics) cannot be inspected with ECT.

What is the difference between ECT and magnetic particle testing?

MT works only on ferromagnetic materials and finds surface-breaking cracks; ECT works on all conductive materials (including aluminum and titanium), detects defects to ~5mm depth, scans faster, and needs no consumables or surface prep. For steel welds MT remains standard; for aerospace alloys ECT is preferred.

What certification do I need for eddy current testing?

ASNT (SNT-TC-1A/CP-189) or ISO 9712 ET Level II is the working-technician qualification — roughly 80–160 training hours plus documented field experience. Level III is required to author procedures. Certification-body exam fees are published by ASNT; training pricing varies by region and scope — request a tailored quote.

Atlantis NDT Products & Services

ECT programs live or die on procedures, personnel, and data management. Atlantis NDT supports inspection teams end to end: run your operation on NDT inspection management software — Atlantis ERP (affordable, accessible, fully customizable), visualize thickness data and corrosion trends on our digital twin platform for asset integrity, and generate code-compliant reports with modern NDT reporting software. Advance your career through ASNT Level III-led NDT training & certification, engage our ASNT Level III consulting team for procedures, audits, and inspector-of-record support, or capture as-built asset geometry with 3D laser scanning services. Pricing varies by region and scope — book a free consultation for a tailored quote.

Where the results from this method end up

A method is only as useful as the record it leaves behind. Inspection companies running this method at scale need the result tied to the asset, the technician’s certification state and the instrument’s calibration status at the time of test — that bundle is what a client audit asks for. The NDT inspection software buyer’s guide and inspection management software cover how that record is held as structured data instead of filed PDFs.

Eddy current testing and eddy current inspection: the practical answer

Eddy current testing (ET) finds surface and near-surface cracks, pitting and wall loss in conductive metals. A coil induces currents in the part, and flaws disturb them. In the US it does three jobs most often: fastener-hole and structural checks on aircraft, tube inspection in heat exchangers and condensers, and crack checks on coated welds. Choose the technique by material and geometry first, because each eddy current technique fails somewhere specific.

Which eddy current technique fits the job

"Eddy current inspection" on a purchase order can mean at least five different techniques. The table below is the selection logic a Level III uses before writing a procedure. IRIS is included because buyers often weigh it against eddy current for tubing, but it is an ultrasonic technique, not ET.

TechniqueWhat it detectsWhere it failsTypical US use
Conventional ET (surface probes, bobbin coils)Surface-breaking cracks in nonferrous metals and austenitic stainless. With bobbin coils: volumetric wall loss, pitting and support wear in nonferromagnetic tubes.Carbon steel tubing, where permeability noise swamps the flaw. Deep subsurface flaws. Heavy deposits that hold the probe off the wall.Aluminum and titanium aircraft structure; copper-alloy, titanium and stainless condenser and exchanger tubes.
Eddy current array (ECA)The same flaws as surface ET, imaged as a C-scan in one encoded pass, with crack length and orientation. With a purpose-built probe and procedure, surface cracks on carbon steel welds through coating.Rough or tightly curved surfaces without a conforming probe. Buried flaws. It still needs reference standards that match the material.Aircraft lap joints and fastener rows, weld-toe screening on coated structures, array probes for tubing.
Remote field testing (RFT)Wall loss, pitting and baffle wear in ferromagnetic tubes. It reads through the wall, so it is about equally sensitive to ID and OD loss.Small isolated pits. Signals near tube sheets and support plates. It cannot easily tell ID from OD loss. It is slower than bobbin ET.Carbon steel shell-and-tube exchangers, feedwater heaters and boiler tubes.
Pulsed eddy current (PEC)Average remaining wall over the probe footprint, through insulation, cladding and fireproofing.Cracks and small pits. ISO 20669 excludes both. Because it averages over a large footprint, localized loss reads shallower than it is.Corrosion-under-insulation screening on insulated carbon steel piping and vessels.
IRIS (ultrasonic, shown for contrast)Direct wall thickness all the way around the tube. It works in any tube material and sizes pits and wall loss.Tubes must be cleaned to bare metal and flooded with water. It is slow per tube and weak on cracks. It is qualified as UT, not ET.Verification samples on carbon steel bundles after RFT screening; air-cooled (fin-fan) exchanger tubes.

Two practical rules come out of the table. First, never let one technique stand in for another just because the crew already has the kit on site. A bobbin probe pushed through carbon steel tubing produces data, but not data you can trust. Second, a screening technique gives you locations, not numbers. PEC and RFT tell you where to look; IRIS or UT thickness gives the measurement that an engineer can use in a remaining-life calculation.

For carbon steel welds where coating removal is the real cost, two electromagnetic options exist. Alternating current field measurement (ACFM, ASTM E2261) and eddy current array built to ASTM E3052 both detect and size surface-breaking cracks without stripping the coating. ASTM E3052's scope covers nonconductive coatings up to 5 mm thick. Magnetic particle testing can also work through thin nonmagnetic coatings, but only with a demonstrated AC-yoke technique such as the one in ASME Section V Article 7.

Eddy current inspection in US industry: three workloads

Aerospace and aviation

Aviation eddy current work is driven by the airframe or engine maker's NDT manual, service bulletins and airworthiness directives. The inspection is written for you: probe, frequency, reference standard, scan path and reject level. Typical tasks are bolt-hole inspection with rotating scanners, surface ET around fastener rows and wheel bead seats, ECA on lap joints, and conductivity checks to ASTM E1004 to screen aluminum for heat damage.

The personnel side is different from industrial work. Most US aerospace employers certify technicians under their own written practices, aligned to customer flow-down and Nadcap AC7114. Atlantis builds aerospace written practices on SNT-TC-1A and trains to them; certification comes from your employer's program. Method background for this sector is on our eddy current testing in aviation page.

Heat-exchanger, condenser and boiler tubing

Gulf Coast refineries, chemical plants and power stations do most tube inspection inside turnaround windows. Tube material decides the technique:

  • Copper alloys, admiralty brass, copper-nickel, titanium and austenitic stainless: bobbin ET, with array probes added where cracking is the concern. ASTM E690 covers in-situ eddy current examination of nonmagnetic exchanger tubes. ASTM E243 covers copper and copper-alloy tube at the mill.
  • Carbon steel: RFT to ASTM E2096 for full-bundle screening, then IRIS on a sample of tubes to size what RFT found.
  • Duplex and other partly magnetic alloys: magnetically biased (saturation) probes, or a different technique. Check this before mobilization, not on the tube sheet.
  • Finned air-cooler tubes in carbon steel: usually an ultrasonic or near-field technique, chosen per bundle.

The output is a tube sheet map and an indication list with estimated percent through-wall. The owner, or the owner's engineer, decides which tubes to plug. The inspection company reports against the criteria the contract names. More on tube methods: eddy current tube inspection and our ECT, IRIS, RFT and MFL comparison.

Weld eddy current (ECA and ACFM)

Weld ET is growing on coated carbon steel: offshore structures, cranes, bridges, storage spheres and in-service pressure equipment. The gain is that no blasting or recoating is needed, and ECA produces an encoded C-scan record instead of a pass/fail note. The limits are real, though. It finds surface-breaking cracks only. Toe geometry, spatter and weld caps that are not ground can all produce signals. The procedure must be demonstrated on weld samples with notches of known depth in the same steel and coating thickness. Treat weld ET as a crack-detection screen at the toes. It does not replace volumetric UT.

Eddy current standards and codes US contracts cite

A common error is to cite ASTM E309 as a general eddy current practice. E309 is specific to steel tubular products examined with magnetic saturation.

DocumentWhat it coversWhere it shows up
ASME BPVC Section V, Article 8Eddy current examination. Its mandatory appendices cover nonferromagnetic heat-exchanger tubing, coated ferritic materials, external-coil examination of tubular products, coating thickness, and surface-crack depth with surface probes.Work where an ASME construction code, or an owner's in-service specification, invokes Section V.
ASME Section V, Articles 15, 17 and 21ACFM (Article 15), remote field testing (Article 17), and pulsed eddy current for corrosion screening (Article 21, added in the 2021 edition).Coated-weld crack checks, carbon steel tube bundles, CUI screening programs.
ASTM E243Electromagnetic (eddy current) examination of copper and copper-alloy tubesMill and production testing of condenser and exchanger tube
ASTM E309Eddy current examination of steel tubular products using magnetic saturationMill testing of steel tube and pipe
ASTM E376Measuring coating thickness by magnetic-field or eddy current methodsPaint and coating thickness verification
ASTM E1004Determining electrical conductivity with the eddy current methodAlloy sorting and heat-damage screening on aluminum
ASTM E2261/E2261MExamination of welds with the alternating current field measurement techniqueCrack detection and sizing on coated welds
ASTM E690 and ASTM E2096/E2096MIn-situ ET of nonmagnetic exchanger tubes (E690); in-situ RFT of ferromagnetic exchanger tubes (E2096)Field bundle inspection during turnarounds
ASTM E3052Examination of carbon steel welds with an eddy current arrayWeld-toe crack screening through coating
ISO 20669Pulsed eddy current thickness testing of ferromagnetic components: 3-65 mm wall, up to 200 mm of coating or insulation, pipe of 50 mm diameter and largerCUI screening specifications written to international practice

One change matters for anyone who cites article numbers. The 2025 edition of Section V was published in July 2025 and became mandatory on January 1, 2026. It added a new Subsection C for in-service techniques, and PEC is among the techniques reported as relocated there. If your ET, ACFM or PEC procedure cites an article number, check it against the edition your contract names. Our ASME Section V guide maps the articles.

Eddy current qualification under SNT-TC-1A

In SNT-TC-1A, electromagnetic testing (ET) is the method, and it is divided into three techniques: eddy current, alternating current field measurement and remote field testing. Magnetic flux leakage is listed as a separate method. A technician certified for eddy current is not automatically qualified for RFT. The employer's written practice must say which techniques each person holds.

  • Training and experience. SNT-TC-1A gives recommended minimum hours by technique and level. The written practice adopts them or justifies changes. Experience has to be in the technique, logged and verifiable.
  • Examinations. Level II takes general, specific and practical exams. The practical should use specimens with known flaws that look like the work: tubing standards for tube analysts, notched plate or weld samples for surface work.
  • Vision. Near-vision acuity checked at least annually, plus a color-contrast check as the written practice requires.
  • Acquisition vs analysis. In tubing work, the person pushing probes and the person calling indications are often different. Many owners require analysts to be Level II or III with tube-specific practicals. Nuclear steam generator work adds EPRI's Qualified Data Analyst performance demonstration.
  • Procedures. When ASME applies, a Level III approves the ET procedure. The 2025 edition of Section V adopts the 2024 edition of SNT-TC-1A, so written practices for Code work should be updated to match.

Atlantis has trained 1,000+ technicians under SNT-TC-1A, at Level I, II and III, self-paced online or onsite at the employer. There is no physical training centre to travel to. The ET Level 2 course covers the method and technique content. Teams in the Gulf states usually start from NDT training in Texas. Our published US training fees list the course costs.

Request a training plan for your ET Level II candidates, with hours mapped to your written practice.

How to buy eddy current testing services

Most poor eddy current results trace back to the request for quotation, not the field crew. A quote is only as good as the information behind it. Run the purchase in this order:

  1. State the question. Crack detection, wall-loss trending, screening ahead of replacement, or a code-required examination. Each needs a different technique and a different report.
  2. Send the asset data. Tube material and specification, outside diameter and wall gauge, tube count and length, U-bends, baffle spacing, prior inspection reports and the damage mechanism you suspect. For surface or weld work, send the material, coating type and thickness, and access.
  3. Agree the technique and procedure up front. Ask for the procedure number, revision and Level III approval before mobilization, not after the report.
  4. Settle the reference standards. Reference tubes must match the bundle's material, diameter and wall. Decide who supplies them and how long they take to make. Lead time on a custom tube can drive the schedule.
  5. Define reporting thresholds. Agree what percent through-wall gets reported, how indications are classified and who makes plugging or repair decisions.
  6. Confirm cleaning and access. Hydroblasting quality decides data quality. Agree an acceptance check for cleanliness before probes go in.
  7. Specify deliverables. Ask for raw data files as well as the PDF, so the next inspection can be compared signal for signal.
DeliverableWhy you want it
Tube sheet map with every indication locatedPlugging decisions and trend comparison at the next turnaround
Indication list with estimated percent through-wall and locationEngineering review and remaining-life input
Raw data files plus calibration recordsRe-analysis, audits and baseline comparison
Procedure, technique sheet and personnel certificationsProof the work met the contract and the written practice
Coverage statement listing tubes not examined and whyPlugged, blocked or inaccessible tubes stay visible instead of disappearing

Questions worth asking any provider: Who analyses the data, and at what level? Is there a secondary analysis? How do you handle tubes the probe cannot pass? What will you do if the tube material turns out to be magnetic? Atlantis performs ET with ASNT-certified technicians under ASNT Level III oversight. If a bundle needs a technique outside our scope, we say so in the quote rather than force a technique that does not fit. Field teams work from Houston across Texas, Louisiana and California. Pricing is quote on request, and we return a quote once we have a complete scope.

Request an inspection quote for tube, surface or weld eddy current work.

Common eddy current mistakes we see in the field

  • Reference tube from the wrong alloy or gauge. Calibration on a tube that does not match makes every depth call wrong by an unknown amount.
  • Screening reported as measurement. PEC and RFT percentages written into a remaining-life calculation without UT or IRIS confirmation.
  • No baseline. A new bundle that is never inspected leaves the first in-service result with nothing to compare against.
  • PDF-only reports. Without the data files, the next crew cannot re-analyse old signals against new ones.
  • Surface-qualified technicians on tubing. Surface ET certification does not make someone a tube data analyst.
  • Outdated code references. Procedures that still cite article numbers or SNT-TC-1A editions the current contract no longer uses.

Every one of these is cheaper to fix in the scope than in the report. If you are not sure which technique your asset needs, start with the eddy current testing service overview, then request an inspection quote with your asset data attached.

Frequently asked questions

How much does eddy current testing cost?

Cost depends on the technique, the tube count or surface area, cleaning and access, the analysis level (single or independent secondary), reference standard fabrication, mobilization and standby time. Atlantis prices ET as quote on request and replies within one business day.

How do I choose between absolute and differential eddy current probes?

Choose by the flaw you expect. Absolute coils respond to gradual changes such as general wall thinning, wear and conductivity shifts. Differential coils compare two adjacent zones, so they ignore slow changes and respond sharply to small, abrupt flaws such as pits and cracks. Tube inspection usually records both channels at once and reads each for what it does best.

What makes up an eddy current testing system?

An eddy current system has four parts: the instrument, the probes, the reference standards and the analysis software. For tubing, the instrument is usually multi-frequency, so a mix channel can suppress support-plate and tube-sheet signals that would otherwise hide flaws. Portable single-channel instruments suit surface and bolt-hole work, and array instruments add encoded C-scan imaging.

What is high frequency eddy current testing used for?

High frequencies, roughly 100 kHz and up, keep the currents close to the surface. That makes them the right choice for fine surface cracks, thin-wall parts and fastener holes. They are the wrong choice for anything below the surface, because penetration drops as frequency rises.

Is electromagnetic testing the same as eddy current testing?

Not quite. Electromagnetic testing (ET) is the method name in SNT-TC-1A, and it includes three techniques: eddy current, alternating current field measurement and remote field testing. Magnetic flux leakage is a separate method. Certifications and procedures should name the technique, not just "ET."

Do I need ASME Section V Article 8 for heat exchanger tube inspection?

Only when a construction code or your own specification invokes it. Much in-service bundle work runs to an owner specification that borrows from Article 8 and the ASTM practices. If your contract calls Section V, the procedure, calibration and personnel requirements of the cited article apply in full.

Who certifies eddy current technicians in the US?

Under SNT-TC-1A and CP-189 the employer certifies its own technicians against its written practice. ASNT certifies Level III individuals and runs the ASNT 9712 central certification program. Aerospace employers do the same, aligned to customer flow-down and Nadcap AC7114. A certificate from a training provider documents training. It is not a certification by itself.

Is eddy current testing better than ultrasonic IRIS for tubes?

Neither is better in general. ET and RFT screen a whole bundle quickly. IRIS measures wall thickness directly but is slower and needs very clean tubes. The usual approach on carbon steel is to screen every tube with RFT, then size a sample with IRIS. On nonferrous tubes, bobbin ET alone usually does the job.

Need eddy current testing (ET) done, or learned?

Atlantis provides eddy current testing (ET) as an inspection service, trains technicians in it, and lets teams practise it on the Practical NDT simulator.

Frequency sets everything in eddy current testing. Standard depth of penetration falls as one over the square root of frequency, permeability and conductivity, so probes above 100 kHz reach 1–2 mm, mid-frequency reaches 3–5 mm, low frequency reaches 5–10 mm, and pulsed eddy current screens 10–25 mm through insulation. Pick the frequency that puts the flaw inside one standard depth, then read phase, not amplitude.

ASME BPVC Section V Article 8 governs eddy current examination of tubular products in North America, with mandatory appendices covering installed non-ferromagnetic heat-exchanger tubing; ISO 15549 sets out general principles; ASTM E426 covers non-ferromagnetic seamless and welded tubular products, and ASTM E309 covers steel tubular products examined with magnetic saturation. Calibration decides the result. A reference tube of the same material, outside diameter and wall thickness carries a 100 percent through-wall hole plus flat-bottom holes at graded depths, and the instrument phase is rotated so lift-off runs horizontally across the impedance plane. Depth then reads off phase angle; amplitude reads volume. Carbon and ferritic steel tubing breaks conventional eddy current testing, because permeability variation from stress and microstructure produces signals larger than the flaw — remote field testing, magnetic flux leakage or near-field testing replace it. Coatings, paint and oxide break nothing: eddy current inspects straight through them, which is precisely where it beats magnetic particle testing on coated components.

Source: ASME BPVC Section V Article 8 (Eddy Current Examination of Tubular Products); ASTM E309 and ASTM E426; ASTM E1004 for conductivity measurement; ISO 15549; ASNT SNT-TC-1A for ET personnel qualification.

Technically reviewed by Anoop Rayavarapu — ASNT NDT Level III (UT, RT, MT, PT, VT)
ECT probe, frequency and depth reached by inspection task
Inspection taskProbe typeFrequency bandDepth reachedGoverning practice
Aerospace surface fatigue crackPencil or differential surface probe100–500 kHz1–2 mmASTM E309 plus the OEM structural specification
Fastener hole crackRotating bolt-hole probe100–500 kHzHole wall to 2 mmOEM structural specification
Non-ferrous heat-exchanger tubingBobbin coil20–100 kHzFull wall of thin-wall tubeASME Section V Article 8, ASTM E426
Circumferential cracking at supports and expansion transitionsArray probe with C-scan output20–100 kHzFull wallASME Section V Article 8
Ferromagnetic tubingRemote field, near-field or magnetic flux leakageLowFull wallConventional ECT fails here — permeability variation swamps the flaw signal
Corrosion under insulation screeningPulsed eddy current0.1–10 kHz10–25 mm of steel through insulation and claddingScreening only; UT produces the thickness number
Alloy sorting, conductivity, coating thicknessAbsolute surface probe60 kHz–2 MHzSurfaceASTM E1004
Two rows carry the decisions people get wrong most often: bobbin coils are near-blind to circumferential cracking, and conventional eddy current does not work on carbon or ferritic steel tubing without saturation. Atlantis NDT ties every ECT result to the asset, the technician's certification state and the instrument's calibration status at the time of test — demo or quote on request.

Why does phase angle matter more than signal amplitude in eddy current testing?

Phase encodes depth. As a flaw sits deeper below the surface, the response lags further, rotating the impedance signal by an angle that maps to depth against a calibration curve. Amplitude encodes volume, but amplitude is also corrupted by lift-off, fill factor and probe wobble. Calibration rotates the display so lift-off runs horizontally, leaving the vertical component readable as flaw response.

Can eddy current testing inspect carbon steel welds?

Not with a conventional probe. Magnetic permeability in ferritic steel changes with stress, heat-affected-zone microstructure and residual field, and that variation produces signals larger than the crack. Two routes work: magnetically saturate the material so permeability stops varying, or switch to alternating current field measurement, which reads surface field distortion and sizes cracks straight through paint and coating.

How is a heat-exchanger tube eddy current examination calibrated?

On a reference tube of the same material, outside diameter and wall thickness as the bundle, machined with a 100 percent through-wall hole plus flat-bottom holes at graded fractions of the wall. The through-wall hole sets the phase reference; the graded holes build the phase-versus-depth curve every indication is read against. The reference tube travels with the crew and is re-run through the shift.

When does array eddy current beat a bobbin coil?

Circumferential cracking. A bobbin coil drives circumferential eddy currents, so a circumferential crack barely disturbs them and the coil reads near nothing — the classic missed defect at tube-to-tubesheet expansion transitions and baffle supports. Array probes drive current in multiple orientations and produce a C-scan image, resolving crack orientation and position around the tube. Bobbin stays faster for general wall loss.

What is fill factor and how does it change tube inspection results?

Fill factor is the ratio of bobbin coil cross-sectional area to tube inside-diameter area, and it drives coupling. A loose coil in an oversized tube loses sensitivity to small flaws and adds wobble noise; a tight coil sticks or scores the tube. Probe diameter is selected against the as-built tube inside diameter, not the nominal, after a gauging pass through the bundle.

How many training and experience hours does ASNT recommend for ET Level II?

ASNT SNT-TC-1A recommends 40 hours of ET training and 210 hours of method experience for Level I, then a further 40 hours of training and 630 cumulative hours of experience for Level II. These are recommendations the employer adopts or modifies in its written practice. ISO 9712 sets 40 hours at each level, with three months of Level 1 and nine months of Level 2 industrial experience.

Having eddy current testing performed on your equipment

This guide explains the method. If what you actually need is the examination carried out — bobbin, array and rotating-probe tube inspection plus surface examination on non-ferrous and coated components — that is the eddy current testing service. Teams mobilise to your site under Atlantis procedures with ASNT Level III oversight; findings are evaluated against the acceptance criteria your contract names, and records are structured to survive a client audit years later. Scope an examination.