The honest answer is that the course is the smallest part. Sponsorship commits an employer to four separate things — classroom or online training hours, documented on-the-job experience under supervision, examination, and the certification programme that issues the credential. Three of those four are internal obligations that continue long after the training invoice is paid, and they are where sponsorship programmes actually fail.
\n\n1. Training hours. This is the part employers price. Hours differ by method and by level, and — this is the part that surprises people — the required number is set by your own Written Practice, not by ASNT. SNT-TC-1A recommends; the employer adopts. If your Written Practice specifies more hours than the recommendation, that is now your binding requirement.
\n2. Documented experience. The candidate needs supervised experience hours in the method, recorded in a form that survives an audit. This cannot be compressed, bought, or substituted with more classroom time. It is the constraint that sets the real timeline, and it requires a certified person available to supervise — which is why companies with one overworked Level II struggle to grow a second.
\n3. Examination. General, specific and practical examinations, with the practical the one candidates most often fail. The employer administers or arranges these under its own programme.
\n4. The programme itself. Someone must own the Written Practice, approve the examinations, and sign the certification. Under SNT-TC-1A that is a Level III. If you do not employ one, you cannot certify anybody, no matter how much training you buy.
\n\nNot money — supervision capacity. Every candidate accumulating experience hours consumes the attention of someone already certified and already busy. A company sponsoring three technicians at once against a single Level II is not running three programmes; it is running one bottleneck. Sequencing candidates against real supervision capacity is the single most useful thing an employer can do before committing.
\n\nEmployer-based certification does not transfer. Under SNT-TC-1A the credential is issued by you and is valid within your programme; a technician who leaves does not carry it to the next employer as a portable qualification, and the new employer will certify them again under its own Written Practice. This cuts both ways. It means a departing employee does not take a portable asset you paid for — but it also means your investment produced nothing you can point to once they are gone.
\nEmployers who care about portability look at central certification under ISO 9712 instead, where a third-party body issues the credential and it moves with the individual. That changes the calculation, and for companies working internationally it often changes the answer.
\n\nEstablish or fix the Written Practice first — everything downstream inherits its requirements. Confirm you have Level III authority to approve and sign; if not, resolve that before enrolling anyone, either by training your own or by contracting the Level III function. Then sequence candidates against supervision capacity rather than against budget.
\nAtlantis delivers training on-site to your crew and supports the programme behind it. Discuss a sponsorship plan.
"}