{"id":"400","title":"RT Level 2 Practice Questions 2026: Free 30-Question Test","slug":"rt-level-2-practice-questions-2026-free-mock-exam","date":"June 24, 2026","author":"Anoop Rayavarapu","category":"Practice Questions","metaDescription":"Free RT Level II practice test: 30 original radiographic testing questions with answers on physics, IQIs, exposure math, interpretation and safety.","snippet":"Free RT Level II practice test: 30 original radiographic testing questions with answers on physics, IQIs, exposure math, interpretation and safety.","content":"\n<p class=\"ptq-meta\" style=\"color:#475569;margin:0 0 16px;\">30 original questions in 6 topics, each with the correct answer, an explanation and its basis. Last reviewed October 16, 2026.</p>\n<section data-practice-test=\"2026-10\" aria-label=\"About this practice test\"><h2>About this RT Level II practice test</h2><p>These 30 questions are original study questions written by Atlantis NDT for technicians preparing for Radiographic Testing (RT) Level II. They are not ASNT examination questions and do not reproduce any certification exam.</p><p>Under ASNT SNT-TC-1A (2024 edition), the employer certifies Level II personnel after general, specific and practical examinations set out in its written practice. ASNT also offers central ASNT NDT Level II examinations (general and method exams), and employers still carry out the vision, practical and job-specific examinations. This set is pitched at what a Level II must do: set up and verify the system, make the exposure, interpret and evaluate radiographs against a procedure, and report the results.</p><p>The questions cover radiation physics and sources, film, screens, IQIs and digital systems, exposure calculations, technique and code requirements, interpretation, and radiation safety. Atlantis NDT runs NDT training year-round, with theory online and hands-on practice on its Practical NDT simulator or in person at the client&apos;s own facility. Simulator practice supports training; it does not replace the practical examination or the experience hours the employer&apos;s written practice requires.</p></section>\n<section aria-label=\"How to use this practice test\"><h2>How to use this practice test</h2><ul><li>Answer each question before opening the explanation, and note the topic of every question you miss.</li><li>Work the calculations on paper; the explanations show each step so you can check your method.</li><li>Check code references against the edition your procedures and written practice actually use, since requirements can change between editions.</li><li>Study your weakest topics, then retake the full set a few days later without notes.</li></ul><p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">Topics in this set:</p><ul><li><a href=\"#topic-radiation-physics-and-sources\">Radiation physics and sources</a> (5 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-film-screens-iqis-and-digital-systems\">Film, screens, IQIs and digital systems</a> (6 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-exposure-calculations\">Exposure calculations</a> (6 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-technique-codes-and-procedures\">Technique, codes and procedures</a> (5 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-interpretation-and-evaluation\">Interpretation and evaluation</a> (5 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-radiation-safety\">Radiation safety</a> (3 questions)</li></ul></section>\n<section class=\"ptq-note\" aria-label=\"Practice questions, not exam questions\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #d97706;padding:8px 0 8px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><h2>Practice questions, not exam questions</h2><p>Atlantis NDT wrote these questions as original study material. They are not taken from ASNT or from any employer&apos;s examination, and real examinations differ in wording, emphasis and format.</p><p>Certification is a separate step: under ASNT SNT-TC-1A the employer certifies its technicians after the examinations its written practice sets, and ASNT runs central Level II examinations for several methods. A good score here is a study signal, not a qualification.</p></section>\n<aside data-course-next-step=\"2026-10\" data-placement=\"answer\" aria-label=\"Next step\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #2563eb;padding:10px 0 10px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><p style=\"margin:0\"><strong>Next step:</strong> Preparing for the RT Level 2 exam? The <a href=\"/rt-level-2-training\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">RT Level 2 course</a> adds structured classroom and hands-on training. Employers: <a href=\"/consulting/ndt-consulting-level-iii\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">ASNT Level III consulting</a> handles procedures, the written practice and qualification exams.</p></aside>\n<section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-radiation-physics-and-sources\" aria-label=\"Radiation physics and sources\"><h2>Radiation physics and sources</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-01\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 1.</span> When X-ray tube voltage (kV) is increased while tube current and exposure time stay the same, what is the main effect on the beam?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Intensity increases but the energy spectrum is unchanged</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Penetration increases and subject contrast falls as the wavelength shortens</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Subject contrast increases because more low-energy photons are produced at higher kV</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Only the effective focal spot size changes</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. Penetration increases and subject contrast falls as the wavelength shortens</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Higher kV raises the maximum and average photon energy (shorter wavelength), so the beam penetrates more and the difference in absorption between thicknesses falls, lowering subject contrast. Intensity also rises, but the first option is wrong because the spectrum does change.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-02\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 2.</span> Increasing X-ray tube current (mA) at a fixed kV mainly:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Increases the maximum photon energy and so the penetration</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Reduces geometric unsharpness by shrinking the focal spot</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Shortens the minimum wavelength of the beam</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Increases intensity but not the photon energy range</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. Increases intensity but not the photon energy range</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Tube current controls how many electrons strike the target, so intensity rises roughly in proportion to mA. The maximum energy and the shape of the spectrum are set by kV, not mA.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-03\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 3.</span> What determines the energies of the gamma rays emitted by an Ir-192 source?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> The isotope itself; they cannot be adjusted</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> The activity of the source in curies or becquerels</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> The physical size of the source pellet</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> The source-to-film distance</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. The isotope itself; they cannot be adjusted</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Gamma-ray energies are characteristic of the decaying isotope. Activity sets how many photons are emitted per second (intensity), not their energy, and distance and source size affect intensity and unsharpness only.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-04\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 4.</span> Which interaction is the main source of scattered radiation when steel is radiographed with Ir-192 or Co-60 gamma rays?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Photoelectric absorption</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Pair production</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Compton scattering</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Coherent (Rayleigh) scattering</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Compton scattering</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">In steel, Compton scattering is the dominant interaction across the gamma energies of Ir-192 and Co-60 and produces most of the scatter that degrades contrast. Pair production needs photon energies above 1.02 MeV and is minor at these energies, while photoelectric absorption dominates only at lower energies.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General radiation physics</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-05\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 5.</span> Compared with Ir-192, Se-75 has:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Higher average gamma energy and a shorter half-life</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Higher average gamma energy and a longer half-life</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> The same gamma energies but a shorter half-life</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Lower average gamma energy and a longer half-life</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. Lower average gamma energy and a longer half-life</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Se-75 emits lower-energy gamma rays than Ir-192, which gives better contrast on thinner steel sections. Its half-life is about 120 days, compared with about 74 days for Ir-192.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle (isotope properties)</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-film-screens-iqis-and-digital-systems\" aria-label=\"Film, screens, IQIs and digital systems\"><h2>Film, screens, IQIs and digital systems</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-06\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 6.</span> What is the main function of lead intensifying screens in film radiography?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> They emit light when struck by radiation, and the light exposes the film</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> They emit electrons that intensify the image and absorb some scatter</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> They allow a lower kV to be used regardless of material thickness</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> They remove the need for an image quality indicator</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. They emit electrons that intensify the image and absorb some scatter</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Lead screens release electrons that add to the film exposure, and the front screen preferentially absorbs lower-energy scattered radiation. Screens that emit light are fluorescent screens, which are a different type.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle; ASTM E94</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-07\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 7.</span> Two films are exposed to the same density. Compared with a fast, coarse-grain film, a slow, fine-grain film gives:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Higher definition and lower graininess, but a longer exposure</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Lower definition and higher graininess, with a shorter exposure</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Higher graininess and a shorter exposure for the same density</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> The same definition with a shorter exposure</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. Higher definition and lower graininess, but a longer exposure</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Finer grain gives better definition and lower graininess but lower film speed, so more exposure is needed to reach the same density. This is why slower films are chosen where high sensitivity is required.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-08\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 8.</span> On a wire-type image quality indicator (IQI), the essential wire is:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Always the thickest wire in the set, whatever the thickness</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> The wire placed closest to the film identification marker</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> The wire specified for the thickness, which must be visible</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Any wire that happens to be visible anywhere on the radiograph</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. The wire specified for the thickness, which must be visible</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">The code or procedure designates the wire diameter for the thickness being radiographed, and seeing that wire shows the required sensitivity was achieved. Seeing only thicker wires means the requirement was not met.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASTM E747; ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-09\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 9.</span> A hole-type (plaque) IQI sensitivity level is stated as 2-2T. What does this mean?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Two plaques must be used, each 2 mm thick</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> The plaque is 2 mm thick and any two of its three holes must be visible</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> The radiograph must show a 2% density difference between two of the plaque holes</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> The plaque is 2% of part thickness and its hole of diameter 2T must be visible</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. The plaque is 2% of part thickness and its hole of diameter 2T must be visible</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">In the hole-type IQI system, the first number is plaque thickness as a percentage of part thickness and the second is the hole that must be seen (1T, 2T or 4T). 2-2T is a commonly specified level and corresponds to an equivalent sensitivity of 2%.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASTM E1025; ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-10\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 10.</span> Why is the IQI normally placed on the source side of the part when access allows?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Because film-side placement is never permitted by any code</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Because the source side is farthest from the film, where unsharpness is greatest</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Because the IQI shields the film from backscattered radiation</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Because source-side placement shortens the required exposure time</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. Because the source side is farthest from the film, where unsharpness is greatest</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Features farthest from the film are imaged with the most geometric unsharpness, so a source-side IQI is the stricter check. Film-side placement is allowed when the source side is inaccessible, with the identification the procedure requires.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle; ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-11\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 11.</span> In computed radiography (CR), the latent image is stored in:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> A silver halide emulsion that is developed chemically</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> An amorphous silicon flat panel that is read out directly after exposure</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> A photostimulable phosphor imaging plate that is read out by a laser scanner</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> A fluorescent screen viewed in real time by a camera</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. A photostimulable phosphor imaging plate that is read out by a laser scanner</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">CR uses reusable phosphor imaging plates that hold the latent image until a scanning laser releases it as light for digitizing. A flat panel read out directly is a digital detector array (DDA), a different technology.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General CR and DDA principles</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-exposure-calculations\" aria-label=\"Exposure calculations\"><h2>Exposure calculations</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-12\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 12.</span> Source size 3 mm, source-to-object distance 600 mm, object-to-film distance 25 mm. Using Ug = F&#xB7;d/D, what is the geometric unsharpness?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 0.0125 mm</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 0.125 mm</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 0.5 mm</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 1.25 mm</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. 0.125 mm</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Ug = F &#xD7; d / D = 3 &#xD7; 25 / 600 = 0.125 mm, where F is the effective source or focal spot size, d is the object-to-film distance and D is the source-to-object distance.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle; ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-13\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 13.</span> A satisfactory exposure takes 2 minutes at a source-to-film distance of 600 mm. With everything else unchanged, what exposure time gives the same density at 900 mm?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 1.33 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 3.0 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 4.5 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 6.75 min</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. 4.5 min</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Exposure time is proportional to the square of the distance: 2 &#xD7; (900/600)&#xB2; = 2 &#xD7; 2.25 = 4.5 min. A linear correction (3.0 min) would under-expose the film.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Inverse square law</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-14\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 14.</span> An acceptable exposure was made at 10 mA for 2 minutes. The X-ray set must now run at 5 mA at the same kV and distance. What exposure time gives the same density?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 1 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 2 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 2.8 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 4 min</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. 4 min</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">At fixed kV and distance, the exposure in mA&#xB7;min is kept constant: 10 &#xD7; 2 = 20 mA&#xB7;min, so 20 / 5 = 4 min.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT principle (reciprocity)</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-15\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 15.</span> An Ir-192 source has an activity of 3,700 GBq (100 Ci) today. Taking the half-life as 74 days, what is its approximate activity after 148 days?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 462 GBq (12.5 Ci)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 925 GBq (25 Ci)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 1,850 GBq (50 Ci)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 2,775 GBq (75 Ci)</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. 925 GBq (25 Ci)</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">148 days is two half-lives, so the activity falls to one quarter: 3,700 / 4 = 925 GBq (25 Ci).</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Radioactive decay</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-16\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 16.</span> An exposure with a Se-75 source took 8 minutes. Taking the half-life as 120 days, approximately what exposure time is needed for the same setup 60 days later?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 8.0 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 12.0 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 11.3 min</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 16.0 min</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. 11.3 min</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">60 days is half of one half-life, so the activity is 1/&#x221A;2 of its original value and the exposure time rises by &#x221A;2 &#x2248; 1.41: 8 &#xD7; 1.41 &#x2248; 11.3 min. 12 min assumes a straight-line increase, and 16 min would apply only after a full half-life.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Radioactive decay</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-17\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 17.</span> From the film&apos;s characteristic curve, the log relative exposure needed for the target density is 0.3 higher than the log relative exposure used. By roughly what factor must the exposure be multiplied?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 1.3</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 2</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 3</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 10</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. 2</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A difference of 0.3 in log E corresponds to a factor of 10^0.3, which is about 2, so the exposure (for example in mA&#xB7;min) must be roughly doubled.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Film characteristic curve</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-technique-codes-and-procedures\" aria-label=\"Technique, codes and procedures\"><h2>Technique, codes and procedures</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-18\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 18.</span> The source is outside a pipe, radiation passes through both walls, and only the wall nearest the film is evaluated. This technique is:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Single-wall single-image (SWSI)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Double-wall double-image (DWDI)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Panoramic single-wall exposure</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Double-wall single-image (DWSI)</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. Double-wall single-image (DWSI)</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">In DWSI the source-side wall is far from the film and too unsharp to interpret, so only the film-side wall is evaluated. In DWDI both walls are evaluated on the same image.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-19\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 19.</span> Why is the source offset from the weld plane when making a double-wall double-image (elliptical) exposure of a small-diameter pipe weld?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> To shorten the exposure time by reducing the path length</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> To avoid the need for an IQI on the source side</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> To place the film-side weld closer to the source for better sharpness</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> To separate the two weld images so neither overlaps the other</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. To separate the two weld images so neither overlaps the other</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Offsetting the source projects the two weld images as an ellipse instead of one on top of the other. A superimposed (non-offset) technique can also be used, but the images overlap and more exposures are then needed to cover the circumference.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-20\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 20.</span> A lead letter &apos;B&apos; is attached to the back of the film holder. The processed radiograph shows a light image of the &apos;B&apos; on a darker background. Under ASME Section V Article 2, this means:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Backscatter protection was inadequate; the radiograph is rejected</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> The film was over-developed in the processor</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Backscatter protection was adequate and the radiograph is acceptable</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> The IQI was placed on the wrong side of the part</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. Backscatter protection was inadequate; the radiograph is rejected</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A light &apos;B&apos; shows that backscattered radiation reached the film around the letter, so backscatter protection was inadequate and the radiograph is rejected. A dark &apos;B&apos; on a lighter background is not a cause for rejection.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-21\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 21.</span> For single-film viewing of a radiograph made with an X-ray source, ASME Section V Article 2 requires the density through the body of the IQI and the area of interest to be within which range?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 1.0 to 3.0</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 1.8 to 4.0</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 2.0 to 4.5</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 2.5 to 5.0</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. 1.8 to 4.0</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">For single-film viewing, the Article 2 limits are 1.8 to 4.0 for X-ray radiographs and 2.0 to 4.0 for gamma-ray radiographs. Composite viewing of two films has separate limits.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-22\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 22.</span> When the IQI cannot be placed on the source side and is placed on the film side, ASME Section V Article 2 requires:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> A lead letter &apos;F&apos; placed adjacent to or on the IQI</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> A second IQI on the source side</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> A higher maximum density limit</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> A lead letter &apos;B&apos; on the front of the film holder</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. A lead letter &apos;F&apos; placed adjacent to or on the IQI</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">The lead &apos;F&apos; tells the interpreter that the IQI was on the film side. This matters because a film-side IQI is imaged more sharply than it would be on the source side.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 2</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-interpretation-and-evaluation\" aria-label=\"Interpretation and evaluation\"><h2>Interpretation and evaluation</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-23\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 23.</span> An area of a processed film transmits 1% of the incident light from the viewer. What is its film density?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 0.01</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 1.0</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 2.0</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 100</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. 2.0</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Density D = log10(I0 / It) = log10(100 / 1) = 2.0.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Film density definition</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-24\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 24.</span> Small, rounded, sharply defined dark spots scattered through the weld metal on a radiograph are most typical of:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Porosity</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Tungsten inclusions</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Incomplete penetration</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> A longitudinal crack</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. Porosity</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Gas pores contain little or no metal, so they appear as rounded areas of higher density (darker). Tungsten inclusions appear lighter than the weld because tungsten is denser than steel.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT interpretation</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-25\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 25.</span> On a radiograph of a GTAW steel weld, a very light (low-density), sharply defined irregular spot most likely indicates:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Porosity</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Slag inclusion</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Tungsten inclusion</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Lack of sidewall fusion</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Tungsten inclusion</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Tungsten absorbs far more radiation than steel, so a tungsten inclusion appears as a light spot. Porosity and slag are less dense than steel and appear darker.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT interpretation</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-26\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 26.</span> In a single-V butt weld, a straight, dark, continuous line along the center of the root, often with sharp parallel edges, most likely indicates:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Incomplete penetration</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Lack of sidewall fusion</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Elongated slag line</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Excessive root reinforcement</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. Incomplete penetration</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Unfused root faces leave a narrow gap along the joint centerline, imaged as a straight dark line. Lack of sidewall fusion usually lies off-center along a bevel face, and excessive root reinforcement appears lighter, not darker.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT interpretation</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-27\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 27.</span> A suspected linear indication is seen on a radiograph. Which observation best suggests it is a film-handling artifact rather than a discontinuity in the part?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> It appears darker than the surrounding weld metal when viewed on the illuminator</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> It runs parallel to the weld axis along the fusion line</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> It is close to the IQI or a location marker</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> In reflected light, the emulsion is visibly scratched at that spot</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. In reflected light, the emulsion is visibly scratched at that spot</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Viewing the film surface in reflected light reveals scratches, pressure marks and similar damage to the emulsion. Real discontinuities are in the part and do not mark the emulsion; darkness and orientation alone do not separate the two.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General RT interpretation</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-radiation-safety\" aria-label=\"Radiation safety\"><h2>Radiation safety</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-28\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 28.</span> A survey meter reads 80 &#xB5;Sv/h at 2 m from an unshielded gamma source. Using the inverse square law, what is the approximate dose rate at 8 m?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 1.25 &#xB5;Sv/h</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 5 &#xB5;Sv/h</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 10 &#xB5;Sv/h</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 20 &#xB5;Sv/h</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. 5 &#xB5;Sv/h</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Dose rate falls with the square of distance: 80 &#xD7; (2/8)&#xB2; = 80 / 16 = 5 &#xB5;Sv/h. Four times the distance gives one sixteenth of the dose rate, not one quarter.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Inverse square law</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-29\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 29.</span> The half-value layer (HVL) of a shielding material for a given source is 12 mm. What thickness reduces the dose rate to one eighth of its unshielded value?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 24 mm</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 36 mm</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 48 mm</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 96 mm</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. 36 mm</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Each HVL halves the dose rate, and one eighth is (1/2)&#xB3;, so three HVLs are needed: 3 &#xD7; 12 = 36 mm. This is the simple narrow-beam calculation; scatter in real shielding means designs add margin.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Half-value layer</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"rt2-30\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 30.</span> Why must a calibrated survey meter be used when approaching a gamma exposure device after every exposure?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> To confirm the source has returned fully to its shielded position</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> To measure the film density</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> To replace the need for a personal dosimeter</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> To check the source activity for the exposure calculation</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. To confirm the source has returned fully to its shielded position</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A survey on every approach is the direct check that the source is back in the shielded position, and failing to survey is a well-known cause of radiography overexposure incidents. Personal dosimeters record dose but do not replace the survey.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: Radiation safety practice</p></details></div></section>\n<section data-course-next-step=\"2026-10\" data-placement=\"end\" aria-label=\"Course next step\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #2563eb;padding:10px 0 10px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><h2 style=\"font-size:1.25rem;font-weight:700;line-height:1.3;margin:0 0 8px;\">Next step: RT Level 2 course</h2><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;\">Practice questions check recall. Structured training adds the classroom and hands-on hours your certification route requires. The <a href=\"/rt-level-2-training\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">RT Level 2 course</a> covers film and digital image interpretation, densitometry and IQI practice, and code acceptance drills. Completing a course is not certification: under an employer-based scheme such as SNT-TC-1A, your employer certifies you after its own examinations.</p><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;\"><strong>For employers:</strong> <a href=\"/consulting/ndt-consulting-level-iii\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">ASNT Level III consulting</a> covers procedures, the written practice, qualification examinations and audit support for your technicians.</p></section>\n<section data-practice-next=\"2026-10\" aria-label=\"Where to go next\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #2563eb;padding:10px 0 10px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><h2>Where to go next</h2><p>Atlantis NDT courses run year-round, with theory online and hands-on practice on the Practical NDT simulator or in person at the client&apos;s own facility. From here:</p><ul><li><a href=\"/radiographic-testing-training\">Radiographic testing (RT) training</a>: what Level I and Level II mean in the method and what the practical examination tests.</li><li><a href=\"/practical-ndt\">Practical NDT simulator</a>: browser-based practical training between classroom sessions.</li><li><a href=\"/ndt-practice-tests\">All NDT practice tests</a>: Level II sets for UT, PAUT, TOFD, RT, MT, PT, VT and ET, with exam preparation guides.</li><li><a href=\"/asnt-ndt-level-ii-exam-prep\">ASNT NDT Level II exam preparation</a>: if you are sitting ASNT&apos;s central Level II examination.</li><li><a href=\"/asnt-level-iii-rt-exam-prep\">ASNT Level III RT exam preparation</a>: the route once Level II work and experience are behind you.</li></ul><p><a href=\"/contact?service=training&amp;subject=RT%20Level%20II%20training\">Enquire about RT Level II training</a> for yourself or for a team. Tell us the method, the level and where the trainees are based.</p></section>","order":0,"createdAt":"2026-06-24","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T00:00:00Z","h1":"Radiographic Testing (RT) Level II Practice Questions"}