{"id":"401","title":"MT Level 2 Practice Questions 2026: Free 30-Question Test","slug":"mt-level-2-practice-questions-2026-free-mock-exam","date":"June 24, 2026","author":"Anoop Rayavarapu","category":"Practice Questions","metaDescription":"Free MT Level II practice test: 30 original magnetic particle testing questions with answers on field direction, equipment checks, interpretation, demag.","snippet":"Free MT Level II practice test: 30 original magnetic particle testing questions with answers on field direction, equipment checks, interpretation, demag.","content":"\n<p class=\"ptq-meta\" style=\"color:#475569;margin:0 0 16px;\">30 original questions in 6 topics, each with the correct answer, an explanation and its basis. Last reviewed October 16, 2026.</p>\n<section data-practice-test=\"2026-10\" aria-label=\"About this practice test\"><h2>About this MT Level II practice test</h2><p>These 30 questions are original study questions written by Atlantis NDT for technicians preparing for Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) Level II. They are not ASNT examination questions and do not reproduce any certification exam.</p><p>Under ASNT SNT-TC-1A (2024 edition), the employer certifies Level II personnel after general, specific and practical examinations set out in its written practice. ASNT also offers central ASNT NDT Level II examinations (general and method exams), and employers still carry out the vision, practical and job-specific examinations. This set is pitched at what a Level II must do: choose and verify the magnetizing technique, carry out the examination, interpret and evaluate indications against a procedure, and report the results.</p><p>The questions cover magnetism principles, current types and field direction, equipment and particle checks, technique control, interpretation, demagnetization and safety. Atlantis NDT runs NDT training year-round, with theory online and hands-on practice on its Practical NDT simulator or in person at the client&apos;s own facility. Simulator practice supports training; it does not replace the practical examination or the experience hours the employer&apos;s written practice requires.</p></section>\n<section aria-label=\"How to use this practice test\"><h2>How to use this practice test</h2><ul><li>Answer each question before opening the explanation, and note the topic of every question you miss.</li><li>For scenario questions, decide the field direction or system check you would use at the bench before reading the options.</li><li>Check code references against the edition your procedures and written practice actually use, since requirements can change between editions.</li><li>Study your weakest topics, then retake the full set a few days later without notes.</li></ul><p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">Topics in this set:</p><ul><li><a href=\"#topic-principles-of-magnetism\">Principles of magnetism</a> (5 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-current-types-and-field-direction\">Current types and field direction</a> (5 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-equipment-particles-and-system-checks\">Equipment, particles and system checks</a> (6 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-technique-and-process-control\">Technique and process control</a> (4 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-interpretation-and-evaluation\">Interpretation and evaluation</a> (5 questions)</li><li><a href=\"#topic-demagnetization-and-safety\">Demagnetization and safety</a> (5 questions)</li></ul></section>\n<section class=\"ptq-note\" aria-label=\"Practice questions, not exam questions\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #d97706;padding:8px 0 8px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><h2>Practice questions, not exam questions</h2><p>Atlantis NDT wrote these questions as original study material. They are not taken from ASNT or from any employer&apos;s examination, and real examinations differ in wording, emphasis and format.</p><p>Certification is a separate step: under ASNT SNT-TC-1A the employer certifies its technicians after the examinations its written practice sets, and ASNT runs central Level II examinations for several methods. A good score here is a study signal, not a qualification.</p></section>\n<aside data-course-next-step=\"2026-10\" data-placement=\"answer\" aria-label=\"Next step\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #2563eb;padding:10px 0 10px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><p style=\"margin:0\"><strong>Next step:</strong> Preparing for the MT Level 2 exam? The <a href=\"/mt-level-2-training\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">MT Level 2 course</a> adds structured classroom and hands-on training. Employers: <a href=\"/consulting/ndt-consulting-level-iii\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">ASNT Level III consulting</a> handles procedures, the written practice and qualification exams.</p></aside>\n<section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-principles-of-magnetism\" aria-label=\"Principles of magnetism\"><h2>Principles of magnetism</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-01\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 1.</span> Which of these materials can be examined by magnetic particle testing?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Austenitic stainless steel (type 316)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Aluminum alloy</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Copper</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Carbon steel</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. Carbon steel</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">MT needs a ferromagnetic material that can be strongly magnetized, such as carbon and low-alloy steel. Austenitic stainless steel, aluminum and copper are not ferromagnetic, so penetrant or eddy current testing is used instead.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-02\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 2.</span> Why do magnetic particles collect at a surface crack in a magnetized part?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> The crack creates a flux leakage field at the surface that attracts them</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> The particles are drawn into the crack by capillary action</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> The crack carries more current than the surrounding metal</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> The particles are electrostatically charged by the magnetizing current</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. The crack creates a flux leakage field at the surface that attracts them</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A discontinuity across the flux path forces some flux out of the part, forming poles at the crack edges, and this leakage field holds the particles. Capillary action is the penetrant testing mechanism, not MT.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-03\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 3.</span> Which property describes a material&apos;s ability to retain magnetism after the magnetizing force is removed?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Permeability</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Retentivity</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Reluctance</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Conductivity</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. Retentivity</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Retentivity is the ability to retain residual magnetism. Permeability is the ease with which a material is magnetized, and reluctance is the opposition to magnetic flux.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-04\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 4.</span> A ferromagnetic material with a wide hysteresis loop typically:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Has low retentivity and is easy to demagnetize</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Has high permeability and very little residual magnetism</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Has high coercive force and is harder to demagnetize</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Cannot be magnetized with direct current</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Has high coercive force and is harder to demagnetize</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A wide loop indicates a magnetically hard material, such as hardened steel, with high retentivity and high coercive force, so more effort is needed to demagnetize it. Soft, low-carbon steels show narrow loops and high permeability.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle (hysteresis)</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-05\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 5.</span> For the best chance of detecting a discontinuity, how should the magnetic field be oriented relative to it?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Parallel to the discontinuity</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Perpendicular to the discontinuity</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> At about 10&#xB0; to the discontinuity</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Orientation does not matter</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. Perpendicular to the discontinuity</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">The leakage field is strongest when the flux crosses the discontinuity at right angles, while a discontinuity parallel to the field produces little or no leakage. This is why each area is examined with two fields at approximately 90&#xB0; to each other.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle; ASTM E709</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-current-types-and-field-direction\" aria-label=\"Current types and field direction\"><h2>Current types and field direction</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-06\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 6.</span> Which current type gives the best sensitivity to discontinuities lying slightly below the surface?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Alternating current (AC)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> High-frequency alternating current</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Direct current (DC), including half-wave rectified</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Current type has no effect on how deep the field reaches</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Direct current (DC), including half-wave rectified</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">AC is concentrated near the surface by the skin effect, which suits surface-breaking cracks. DC and rectified currents magnetize deeper into the part and so give better sensitivity to near-surface discontinuities.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-07\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 7.</span> Current passed end to end through a bar (a head shot) produces which field, and which discontinuities does it detect best?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> A longitudinal field; transverse discontinuities</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> A circular field; discontinuities parallel to the bar&apos;s long axis</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> A circular field; discontinuities perpendicular to the long axis</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> No field inside the bar; only end-face discontinuities</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. A circular field; discontinuities parallel to the bar&apos;s long axis</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Current flowing along the bar creates a circular field around its axis, which crosses longitudinal discontinuities at right angles. Transverse discontinuities need a longitudinal field, for example from a coil.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-08\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 8.</span> A long bar is magnetized in an encircling coil. Which discontinuities are best detected?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Transverse discontinuities, perpendicular to the bar&apos;s axis</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Longitudinal discontinuities, parallel to the bar&apos;s axis</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Only discontinuities on the end faces</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Only subsurface laminations</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. Transverse discontinuities, perpendicular to the bar&apos;s axis</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A coil produces a longitudinal field along the bar&apos;s axis, which crosses transverse discontinuities. Longitudinal discontinuities lie parallel to this field and give little leakage.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-09\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 9.</span> The inside surface of a steel tube must be examined for longitudinal cracks. Which technique is most suitable?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> A head shot with current passed through the tube wall</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> An encircling coil</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> A central conductor (threader bar) passed through the bore</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> A permanent magnet on the outside surface</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. A central conductor (threader bar) passed through the bore</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Current through a central conductor creates a circular field in the tube wall at both the inside and outside surfaces, crossing longitudinal cracks. With a head shot through a hollow part, the field at the inside surface is essentially zero.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle; ASTM E709</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-10\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 10.</span> Using the right-hand rule for a straight conductor, if the thumb points in the direction of conventional current flow, the curled fingers show:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> The direction of particle movement</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> The direction of a longitudinal field along the conductor</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> The direction of current induced in the part</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> The direction of the circular field around the conductor</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. The direction of the circular field around the conductor</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">With the conductor grasped and the thumb along the current, the fingers curl in the direction of the circular field. Inspectors use this to predict field direction for head shots, central conductors and prods.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-equipment-particles-and-system-checks\" aria-label=\"Equipment, particles and system checks\"><h2>Equipment, particles and system checks</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-11\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 11.</span> When using prods, which discontinuities are best detected, and what is a key risk?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Discontinuities parallel to the line joining the prods; arc burns at the contact points</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Discontinuities perpendicular to the line joining the prods; demagnetization of the part</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Only subsurface discontinuities; overheating of the particles</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Discontinuities in any direction from one placement; no particular risk</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. Discontinuities parallel to the line joining the prods; arc burns at the contact points</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Current flows between the prod tips, producing a circular field that crosses discontinuities lying along the current path. Poor contact, or energizing before firm contact, can cause arc burns that may be unacceptable on finished or hardenable surfaces.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle; ASME BPVC Section V, Article 7</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-12\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 12.</span> With an electromagnetic yoke, a discontinuity is best detected when it lies:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Between the poles and running parallel to the line joining them</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Directly under one pole, at any orientation</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Between the poles, perpendicular to the line joining them</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Outside the area between the poles, beyond either leg</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Between the poles, perpendicular to the line joining them</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A yoke produces a longitudinal field running from pole to pole, so discontinuities lying across that line produce the strongest leakage. The yoke is then repositioned at about 90&#xB0; to cover the other orientation.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle; ASTM E709</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-13\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 13.</span> Under ASME Section V Article 7, what minimum lifting power must an AC electromagnetic yoke have at the maximum pole spacing that will be used?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> 10 lb (4.5 kg)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> 25 lb (11 kg)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> 40 lb (18 kg)</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> 50 lb (23 kg)</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. 10 lb (4.5 kg)</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Article 7 requires an AC yoke to lift at least 10 lb (4.5 kg) at the maximum pole spacing that will be used, verified with a test weight as the code and procedure require. DC and permanent-magnet yokes need a higher lifting power, and ASTM E709 states its own values and pole spacings, so check the document your procedure invokes.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 7</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-14\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 14.</span> What is an artificial flaw shim used for in MT?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> To measure the concentration of the wet particle bath in the tank</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> To show the surface field can reveal a fine flaw in that direction</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> To demagnetize small parts after the examination</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> To measure UV-A intensity at the examination surface</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. To show the surface field can reveal a fine flaw in that direction</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A shim carries a fine artificial notch; fixed notch-side to the surface, a clear indication shows the field and technique can reveal a discontinuity in that orientation. Pie-shaped indicators are mainly used to show field direction, and bath concentration is checked by a settling test.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 7; ASTM E1444</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-15\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 15.</span> How is the concentration of a wet magnetic particle bath normally checked?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> With a hydrometer floated in a sample drawn from the bath</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> With a viscosity cup timed at bath temperature</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> With a UV-A meter held over the agitated bath</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> By a settling test in a pear-shaped centrifuge tube</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. By a settling test in a pear-shaped centrifuge tube</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A measured sample is left to settle for the time the standard sets, and the settled volume is read and compared with the procedure limits. The settled sample is also checked for contamination.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASTM E709; ASTM E1444</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-16\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 16.</span> Which particle type generally gives the highest sensitivity to fine surface cracks?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Dry visible powder</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Wet fluorescent particles</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Coarse dry powder applied by hand</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Dry red powder on a hot surface</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. Wet fluorescent particles</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Small fluorescent particles in a liquid carrier are highly mobile, and a bright indication against a dark background is easy to see. Dry powder is better suited to rough surfaces and near-surface discontinuities with rectified current.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-technique-and-process-control\" aria-label=\"Technique and process control\"><h2>Technique and process control</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-17\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 17.</span> In the wet continuous method, when are the particles applied?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Only after the current has been switched off, using the residual field</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Before the part is magnetized, with the bath then allowed to dry</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> While the magnetizing current is on, so particles collect in the field</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> After the part has been demagnetized</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. While the magnetizing current is on, so particles collect in the field</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">In the continuous method the bath is applied so the particles are still mobile while the magnetizing current is on, and the flow is stopped as the final shot is applied so indications are not washed away. Applying particles after the current is off is the residual method.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASTM E709; ASTM E1444</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-18\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 18.</span> A Level II must look for near-surface lack of fusion in a rough multipass weld using portable equipment. Which combination is generally most effective?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> AC with wet fluorescent particles</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Half-wave rectified DC with dry powder</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> A permanent magnet with wet visible particles</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> An AC coil with no particles, reading a field meter</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. Half-wave rectified DC with dry powder</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Rectified current magnetizes below the surface, and the pulsating field helps dry powder move toward leakage fields on rough surfaces. AC with wet fluorescent particles is the better choice for fine surface-breaking cracks.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-19\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 19.</span> Why should thick paint or coatings normally be removed before MT?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> They hold the particles away from the leakage field</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> They make the part non-magnetic under the coating</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> They increase the flux density in the part and cause furring</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> They prevent demagnetization after the examination</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. They hold the particles away from the leakage field</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Leakage fields weaken quickly with distance from the discontinuity, so a thick coating can hide fine cracks. Thin coatings may be left only where the procedure has been shown to detect the required discontinuities through them.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle; ASME BPVC Section V, Article 7</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-20\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 20.</span> Which viewing conditions are required when inspecting with fluorescent magnetic particles?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Bright white light at the examination surface, with no UV-A source</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> A UV-C lamp in a darkened area to make the particles brighter</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> A polarizing filter over the inspector&apos;s eyes to cut glare</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> A darkened area, and UV-A intensity verified at the surface</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. A darkened area, and UV-A intensity verified at the surface</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Fluorescent indications are viewed under UV-A in reduced ambient light, with UV-A intensity and ambient light checked against the procedure limits and the inspector&apos;s eyes allowed to adapt to the dark. UV-C is hazardous and is not used.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: ASME BPVC Section V, Article 7; ASTM E709</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-interpretation-and-evaluation\" aria-label=\"Interpretation and evaluation\"><h2>Interpretation and evaluation</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-21\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 21.</span> Compared with the indication from a surface crack, an indication from a subsurface discontinuity is typically:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Sharper and more tightly held</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Always circular</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Visible only under white light</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Broader and less distinct</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. Broader and less distinct</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Leakage from a subsurface discontinuity spreads out before reaching the surface, so the particles form a wider, fuzzier pattern. Surface cracks give sharp, well-defined lines.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT interpretation</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-22\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 22.</span> A fuzzy indication disappears after the part is demagnetized and re-examined. It was most likely:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> A fatigue crack</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> A forging lap</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Magnetic writing</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> A subsurface inclusion</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Magnetic writing</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Magnetic writing is a local residual field left where the part touched another magnetized object; it disappears after demagnetization and does not return. Relevant discontinuities reappear when the part is magnetized and examined again.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT interpretation</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-23\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 23.</span> A forging shows a wavy, sometimes intermittent linear indication lying at a shallow angle to the surface. What is it most likely?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> A forging lap</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> A quench crack</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Gas porosity</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Magnetic writing</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. A forging lap</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A lap is metal folded over during forging, so it lies at a shallow angle to the surface and its indication is often wavy or intermittent. Quench cracks are typically sharp and jagged, often at section changes, porosity gives rounded indications, and magnetic writing disappears after demagnetization.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT interpretation</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-24\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 24.</span> Particles build up heavily along edges and corners and are held across the whole surface, hiding possible indications. The most likely cause is:</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Field strength too low</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Demagnetization not carried out before the examination</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> UV-A intensity too high</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Field strength too high (over-magnetization)</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. Field strength too high (over-magnetization)</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">An excessive field produces strong leakage at geometric features and a heavy background (furring) that can mask relevant indications. The current should be reduced to the level the procedure specifies.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT interpretation</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-25\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 25.</span> An indication is suspected to be non-relevant because it lies at a sharp change in section. What should the Level II do before classifying it?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Record it as a crack without further checks, to be safe</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Ignore it, since geometric indications are always non-relevant</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Confirm its cause, by re-examining or by another method</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Increase the current until the indication becomes sharp enough to classify</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Confirm its cause, by re-examining or by another method</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Section changes can produce non-relevant indications, but cracks also start at these stress raisers. The cause must be confirmed before an indication is dismissed.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT interpretation</p></details></div></section><section class=\"ptq-topic\" id=\"topic-demagnetization-and-safety\" aria-label=\"Demagnetization and safety\"><h2>Demagnetization and safety</h2><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-26\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 26.</span> Why may parts need to be demagnetized after MT?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> A residual field can cause arc blow, hold chips or affect instruments</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Demagnetization removes the particles from the surface before cleaning</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Residual magnetism makes the part non-ferromagnetic over time</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Demagnetization is needed to verify the field strength used</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. A residual field can cause arc blow, hold chips or affect instruments</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A residual field can interfere with welding, machining, plating, bearing operation and sensitive instruments. Whether demagnetization is required, and to what level, is set by the procedure or specification.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle; ASTM E709</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-27\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 27.</span> Which principle underlies effective demagnetization?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Applying a single strong DC pulse in the same direction as the magnetizing field</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Warming the part to about 100 &#xB0;C</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Tapping the part with a hammer</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Reversing the field while gradually reducing it to zero</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: D. Reversing the field while gradually reducing it to zero</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A reversing field of decreasing strength takes the material round smaller and smaller hysteresis loops until little residual field remains. The starting field should be at least as strong as the field used for the examination.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-28\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 28.</span> A large part was magnetized with DC. Why might AC demagnetization through a coil leave a residual field?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> AC does not reverse direction, so it cannot demagnetize</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> The skin effect keeps the AC field near the surface</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> AC demagnetization increases the retentivity of the steel</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> AC cannot be reduced in strength once the coil is energized</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: B. The skin effect keeps the AC field near the surface</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">AC demagnetization works well near the surface, but its field does not penetrate deeply. Reversing, stepped-down DC is used where a DC field penetrated deep into a large section.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-29\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 29.</span> How is the residual field normally checked after demagnetization?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> With a field indicator or gaussmeter</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> With a UV-A radiometer held at the surface</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> With a settling tube filled from the bath</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> By measuring the part&apos;s temperature with a contact probe</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: A. With a field indicator or gaussmeter</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">A field indicator or Hall-effect gaussmeter shows whether the remaining field is within the limit set by the procedure or customer specification.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: General MT principle; ASTM E709</p></details></div><div class=\"ptq-question\" id=\"mt2-30\" style=\"margin:0 0 22px;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d7e1ea;border-radius:8px;\"><p class=\"ptq-stem\" style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:600;\"><span class=\"ptq-num\" style=\"color:#075fa8;\">Question 30.</span> Which is an appropriate safety precaution during MT?</p><ol class=\"ptq-options\" type=\"A\" style=\"list-style:none;padding-left:0;margin:0 0 8px;\"><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">A.</span> Remove a cracked UV-A lamp filter to make the lamp brighter</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">B.</span> Energize the prods before they are in firm contact to check the current</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">C.</span> Avoid looking into the UV-A lamp; keep oil baths away from ignition sources</li><li style=\"margin:2px 0;\"><span style=\"display:inline-block;min-width:1.6em;font-weight:600;\">D.</span> Use prods on finished bearing surfaces, since arc strikes there are harmless</li></ol><details class=\"ptq-answer\" style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\"><summary style=\"cursor:pointer;color:#075fa8;font-weight:600;\">Show answer</summary><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">Correct answer: C. Avoid looking into the UV-A lamp; keep oil baths away from ignition sources</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;\">UV-A lamps should not be viewed directly, and damaged filters must be replaced because they can pass harmful radiation. Petroleum-based carriers are combustible, and prods must be in firm contact before current flows to avoid arcing.</p><p style=\"margin:6px 0;color:#475569;\">Basis: MT safety practice</p></details></div></section>\n<section data-course-next-step=\"2026-10\" data-placement=\"end\" aria-label=\"Course next step\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #2563eb;padding:10px 0 10px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><h2 style=\"font-size:1.25rem;font-weight:700;line-height:1.3;margin:0 0 8px;\">Next step: MT Level 2 course</h2><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;\">Practice questions check recall. Structured training adds the classroom and hands-on hours your certification route requires. The <a href=\"/mt-level-2-training\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">MT Level 2 course</a> covers magnetization technique and field direction, field-adequacy checks and interpretation practice on flawed weld samples. Completing a course is not certification: under an employer-based scheme such as SNT-TC-1A, your employer certifies you after its own examinations.</p><p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;\"><strong>For employers:</strong> <a href=\"/consulting/ndt-consulting-level-iii\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">ASNT Level III consulting</a> covers procedures, the written practice, qualification examinations and audit support for your technicians.</p></section>\n<section data-practice-next=\"2026-10\" aria-label=\"Where to go next\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #2563eb;padding:10px 0 10px 16px;margin:24px 0;\"><h2>Where to go next</h2><p>Atlantis NDT courses run year-round, with theory online and hands-on practice on the Practical NDT simulator or in person at the client&apos;s own facility. From here:</p><ul><li><a href=\"/magnetic-particle-testing-training\">Magnetic particle testing (MT) training</a>: what Level I and Level II mean in the method and what the practical examination tests.</li><li><a href=\"/practical-ndt\">Practical NDT simulator</a>: browser-based practical training between classroom sessions.</li><li><a href=\"/ndt-practice-tests\">All NDT practice tests</a>: Level II sets for UT, PAUT, TOFD, RT, MT, PT, VT and ET, with exam preparation guides.</li><li><a href=\"/asnt-ndt-level-ii-exam-prep\">ASNT NDT Level II exam preparation</a>: if you are sitting ASNT&apos;s central Level II examination.</li><li><a href=\"/asnt-level-iii-mt-exam-prep\">ASNT Level III MT exam preparation</a>: the route once Level II work and experience are behind you.</li></ul><p><a href=\"/contact?service=training&amp;subject=MT%20Level%20II%20training\">Enquire about MT Level II training</a> for yourself or for a team. Tell us the method, the level and where the trainees are based.</p></section>","order":0,"createdAt":"2026-06-24","updatedAt":"2026-10-16T00:00:00Z","h1":"Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) Level II Practice Questions"}